Philadelphia International Cricket
Tournament
Greetings to all
the once-a-week and sedentary ANZACs toiling away at home. This is the
match report of the Wandering ANZACS after day 1 of the 2002
Philadelphia International Cricket Tournament. Of the 14 teams invited
this year, the ANZACs are the only first-timers. But it didn't take
long to dispel any notions that we would be easy-beats.
From the beautiful facilities at Merion Cricket Club (est.1865), we met
the boys from Lloyd's of London for the first game. In spite of a
forecast that called for rain throughout the day, the weather was
fine, the clouds were rapidly clearing and at about 15'C (59'F) with no
wind to speak of, it was a perfect day for cricket. Merion Cricket Club
is also known for tennis and after this tournament, the cricket field is
converted into no less than 32 lawn tennis courts for the summer. As
such, the conditions were incredible. Even Stephen Willott (Junior)
couldn't wait to throw his wearying carcass on the beautiful soft
grass. One of the ANZACs even suggested he would have been happy to pay
$400 to play here.
The skipper Damien Cummins (Pants) employed a secret strategy in the
field after winning the toss and electing to field first. He opened
with Henry Witz (Droid), a keeper who proudly claimed to have only
bowled three overs since moving to the USA, and Junior, much to the
chagrin to at least one traditional opening bowler left champing at the
bit. However, Pants' shrewd plan yielded a wicket in the very first
over, silencing any and all criticism. Well, until Junior bowled his
one and only over, troubling the scorer with sundries and boundaries
for a total of nine deliveries. Satbir (Mac) replaced Junior from the
Haveford Station end. After a couple more overs and another wicket, Droid
was relieved and the ANZACs bowling went from strength to strength.
The opener for Lloyd's got on top and stayed on top, before being
retired per the rules at 50. The ANZACs got amongst it and completely
decimated the Lloyd's middle order taking six wickets for just ten runs
in the last five overs. Ronnie Arneja (Runny) bowled brilliantly at the
end collecting three scalps for only ?????? runs and was ably backed up
by Mac and Hugh (Jorgan). Lloyd's, in the end, made 136 which was a
pretty good score on such a large ground.
Pants and Mac went out to bat and quickly established a good
partnership before Mac, a magnet for such things apparently, was run
out by a direct hit from mid-on. Needing 5.5 runs per over from the
outset, the ANZACs were never far off track. Pants had a couple of
chances and finally decided to avoid the retirement nonsense by getting
himself out (LBW) on 49. With just 25 runs to get off 5 overs, the
ANZACs lost a couple of quick wickets and suddenly Lloyd's were on top
for the first time. With an over to go and 8 runs to get for victory,
Runny faced up to a hitherto quite successful seaming leg break bowler
and immediately dispatched his first ball over square leg, no more than
8 feet off the ground all the way into the window of a basement office,
a distance of over 70 meters (215) feet. The response from the bowler
was a very English and very politely uttered "Oh F__k". The field was
brought all the way in to save singles but Runny was to have none of
that, smashing the second ball back past mid off for four. The
ANZACs won with four balls and two wickets to spare and rumors
quickly spread around the tournament that we just might be the ones to
watch.
Game 2 was played at nearby Haverford College,
the only school in America
that lists cricket as an official sport. Our old friends, Sarasota
(Florida) were the foe
and it looked as though it was going to be quite a friendly match. Sarasota
had already played a game at this field in the morning and were
resoundingly thrashed scoring only 99 and then only bowling 11 overs to
concede defeat.ANZAC spirits were high and we were optimistic of easy
victory. This
was our first mistake......
On the Shiloh (1-10) scale of wicket quality, Haverford was only about
a 9 (Merion was at least a 20) and the thick lush grass quickly
took all momentum off ground balls and limited Sarasota to mostly
singles for many overs. Unfortunately, the ANZACs put down three
catches that proved very costly. Eventually, Sarasota
starting taking the long handle to us and used the short boundaries to
their advantage. In spite of being only 82 runs after 18 overs, they
were 106 after 21 and 169, for the loss of about five wickets, after 25
overs had been bowled. With very few bright spots in the bowling
department, the ANZACs fielding performance in general warrants little
further comment. Nevertheless, the ANZACs faith in their batting did
not waiver and Pants determined that a solid opening partnership would
set us up for victory. After running Mac out on the very first ball for
a platinum duck, the rest of us hoped another secret strategy was
unfolding. However, it was not to be as very few batsmen troubled the
scorers as the ANZACs collapsed in a screaming heap being all out for
42. Sundries top scored with 21.
Over several tournament supplied Sierra Nevada
and Yeungling's beers, the ANZACs reflected on a day of mixed fortunes,
removed their heads from their butts and took a long, hard look at
themselves. With the first game of Day 2 being against the undefeated,
and tournament favorite, Timberfields side from the UK, it has quickly
come down to a "must win" situation. For more details and up to the
minute results, go to http://www.cricketfestival.com.
Day two of the
Philadelphia Cricket festival dawned with grey skies overhead and the
steady patter of rain on the roof. Scheduled to play a tough game
against the defending tournament champs, Timberfields, we were advised
of a change in format because of the conditions. The game would still
be played, but in a reduced form indoors. Clearly, it was necessary to
alter our approach to the game. The batsman stood with his back to the
fence and a half moon of field out in front of him. Big hitting was no
longer an option as anything that went over the fences just 30 yards
from the bat was an automatic out. This was going to be a game of quick
singles and a few lucky bounces.
Damien (Pants) won the toss for the third time and asked Timberfields to
bat. We set the tone in the field with great zest and enthusiasm and
caught them off guard. They were 5 for 8
after five overs and suddenly we thought we could bowl them
out for the lowest score in the tournament. However, a few cautious
batsmen and one we called back after a run out saw them build a decent
score of 65 in 20 overs. This was a typical score in this format,
though certainly not daunting. The ANZACs went in to bat confident of
knocking the runs off and picking up the upset.
However, things went badly very quickly. Somewhere between the party
the night before and the breakfast table, the ANZACs forgot how to run
between the wickets. Pants and Satbir (Mac) started the innings and
Pants realizing that he didn't want to run Satbir out for the third time
in as many games ran himself out instead. This continued throughout the
innings with five guys taking that route back to the "pavilion". None
of the batsmen was able to get among the runs and in the end we ran out
of options to be bowled out for 49, a disappointing end to the day and,
apparently, of our hopes for making the final of the tournament.
The clouds clearing overhead meant an earlier than expected return to
the outdoor format for the afternoon rounds. The fields at Germantown
Cricket Club were spectacular. Much like the field at Merion, this one
was a full 70 yards and more to the boundary in every direction and the
grass was again as pristine as the fairways at Pinehurst. Our opponents
were one of the host sides, the British Officers Cricket Club. Unknown
to us, before the game, BOCC were undefeated and had an eye on winning
the entire tournament which was considered bad form by the remainder of
the host sides (there are five). The other sides, naturally, cheered
for any team playing against BOCC.
Pants finally lost a toss and we were asked to bat. Because of the
later start and with the strong chance of a thunderstorm later in the
afternoon, the game was reduced to 20 overs each way. The bowling looked
innocuous enough, and we took to it with vigor. That proved costly as we
quickly lost four wickets for about 20 runs. Then, amazingly for the
ANZACs, a stable partnership developed between Sameer (Kak), who had
joined us from DC for the day, and Henry (Droid) took us to 104, a
challenging score. The Officers looked to be chasing well at
54 for 2 in 11 overs, but then the ANZACs came roaring back with some
tight bowling and great fielding to send them all packing in the
penultimate over for 79. This was a great comeback for us all after
being down after the morning's play.
The evening was capped with a few hours of socializing in the Germantown
club house and an Indian dinner as we all looked forward to day three of
the tournament. Today will see us playing the Germantown
side with their guest player, the South African vice captain Mark
Boucher.
Facing our fifth
game in a row, a weary ANZACs side awoke this Friday morning to a
beautiful, clear day. The skies had cleared after the cold front had
passed through the previous day and only a stiff wind made the
conditions less than perfect. Back to Germantown
we were thankful that we at least had 11 players for this game. Not
knowing what to expect, Damien (Pants) and the Germantown
captain went out to the middle. The Germantown captain asked Pants what
he wanted to do and when told that the ANZACs would bat said "OK", so
no toss was ever done. With the prospect of Mark Boucher batting
against us later, the fifth innings of the tournament for the ANZACs
began. In the first over, it became very apparent that Germantown
were being fine hosts with no strong intention of winning the game. An
American baseball player, with little cricket experience, opened the
bowling, off a zero pace run up and met expectations given the
scenario. He ended up bowlin g a full five over spell and the bowling at
the other end was hardly intimidating. Boucher kept for the entire
innings and right up at the stumps and was kept busy by a flurry of
balls down the leg side off the inexperienced bowling. Pants decided
again that retiring at 50 was a waste of time although it was a
brilliant ankle high caught and bowled that did him in on 46. With
copious wides and no balls, the opening partnership put on over 100 runs
in about 15 overs. In the end, with several good contributions
including a
fine 50-odd retired
from Harmon (Britney), we compiled a total of 186 runs which at the
time was the highest innings scored in the tournament. Germantown
started with a fine opening pair that threatened early. Simon (Agro) who
was crippled from four grueling matches elected not to bowl until or
unless required. Pants meanwhile challenged the scorers by bowling a
different bowler for each of the first eight overs before settlin g on
Vijay (Muffin) and Mac for a few. After the fall of the second wicket,
Mark Boucher came to the crease and eased himself in actually giving Mac
a "wicked" wicket maiden for his troubles. Before long, however, he
opened up and pounded two glorious straight sixes and another one over
mid wicket before retiring at 50. There was not much support for Mark
at the other end of the wicket and seven wickets had fallen by the time
he retired, and the required run rate continued to climb in spite of
his efforts. We worked hard to get rid of the next two wickets so that
he could return at which time he pounded a few more balls to the
boundary. Incredibly, off Satbir's (Mac's) bowling, Pants dropped a
catch on the boundary at mid-wicket; an absolutely regulation catch for
him normally. However, Pants agreed with the team consensus and brought
himself on to bowl the next over and had Boucher caught at deep mid-on
by a very determined Ronnie (Easy - previously Runny) who s howed Pants
how easy it is.
In the end, the ANZACs won comfortably by about 60 runs. The afternoon
was spent watching the game at Philadelphia Cricket Club on a ground
easily as beautiful as Merion's, although the team is divided on this
point. For my money, both grounds are so close to perfect, comparisons
aren't all that meaningful. From our observations of the game in
progress between Sarasota
and BOCC, it seemed the wicket played very low and slow. Pants continued
the generation of goodwill by the ANZACs in the tournament by
performing neutral umpire along with Mac. Dragging Pants away from the
umpiring and a game in which he was clearly invested, we headed back to
the hotel to get ready for the next social event; a barbecue at the
Merion Cricket Club. During the evening, John (Befok), Agro and Stephen
(Junior) paced out Easy's big hit from the first game against Lloyds of
London. We agreed it was in the vicinity of 85 meters. In Fuego! The
night include d a fine buffet dinner of barbecued items and free beer
while it lasted. At the end of the evening, spokesmen (usually the
captain) for the various teams introduced their teams and Pants took
the opportunity to give a brief history of cricket in North
Carolina, focussing on the ANZACs, of course.
Uncharacteristically, Pants speech ended inside the two minutes
requested. The rest of the evening had even less to do with cricket and
the fourth day loomed for our final game. At this stage, it had become
clear that our loss to Timberfields had cost us a run at the final. BOCC
had beaten everybody but us and Timberfields were unbeaten. They were to
play the last game on the fourth day and if we had beaten Timberfields,
we would've been through to the final. However, and perhaps luckily for
the tournament, the game between those two sides was to be watched by
quite a crowd because it was effectively a playoff game; the winner
would go straight through to the final. Our game, at Philadelphia,
was against the local team but a quick perusal of the team we were to
play indicated this would again be an easy game. Pants sent the
Africans in to open the innings but Henry (Droid) was beautifully
caught at mid-wicket by a fellow who dropped every other chance that
came his way through the rest of the innings, much to Droid's chagrin
of course. Agro joined Befok in the middle and they put on about 100
before Befok retired with 50. Agro retired at 52 a couple of overs later
and with several overs to go, a huge score was in the offing. Some of
our batting was clearly too good for the bowling they faced as few of
the recognized batsmen scored any runs of significance. In the end, the
ANZACs compiled 216 for the loss of seven wickets. As expected, the Philadelphia
batting was pretty casual and on ANZAC insistence, Pants opened the
bowling. Even Sudeep (Hal) got a bowl. Wides and wickets were the order
of the day as Pa nts got one of each in each of his first three overs.
It had also been negotiated that a fine involving beer consumption
would be levied against each bowler for transgressions including wides
and no balls. It proved difficult to keep count but not as difficult as
getting some of the boys (other than Hal) to ante up, after the game.
We were going to allow all fifteen or so Germantown
players to bat and always gave those with golden ducks to try again but
the official umpire (yet another one from Trinidad)
insisted on calling a halt to proceedings after ten wickets had fallen.
With Agro again lamenting our loss to Timberfields on Day 2 after we had
them 5 for 8, we completed our involvement in the tournament with a fair
4-2 win-loss record. The BOCC v Timberfields game was played at
Germantown in the afternoon and with Mark Boucher as BOCC's guest for
the game, things never looked good for Timberfields although Boucher did
bowl a full five overs and did not keep wick et. However, Boucher
contributed another 50-odd retired to help set up the BOCC victory and
their place in the final on Sunday. The night was billed as a picnic at
Germantown but again, it was a silver service buffet, and ended with a
few speeches, a presentation to the organizers which was loudly
applauded, a presentation to Gary Kirsten's wife and Mark Boucher's
girlfriend who were well worth having up on stage for a few minutes to
ogle at and then a long, curious tag team performance by Kirsten and
Boucher to a rapt crowd. Finally an auction was held for charity and
some odd items were sold for ridiculous amounts of money as usual in
such things. Final report coming next with the tournament wrap up and
final thoughts.
Wrapping up the 2002 Philadelphia
International Cricket Festival, the ANZACs acquitted themselves quite
well. With the relatively lean side we took to Philadelphia (relative
to the talent theoretically available to the Wandering ANZACs touring
side), it is clear we are in a great
position to return next year to
end the domination of visiting English sides who have won in recent
years. In summary, we lost the whole tournament because of one game
which we should 've won easily. So it goes with this fickle game. For
all the statistics related to the tournament, please visit http://www.cricketfestival.com It is to be noted that we were well
received by the tournament organizers who only invited us at the last
minute. All of them expressed to us their
appreciation that we encapsulated
the spirit of the festival and that would absolutely be invited again.
The rest of this email is largely
personal opinion although much of it is shared by many, particularly
within the ANZACs organization. Those of us who went on tour on this
occasion with great anticipation and low expectations were stunned by
the facilities availed to us and the sheer majesty of the grounds where
we played. Beyond the grandstands and changing rooms, replete with full
bathroom amenities including razors and aftershave, there was the
cricket museum at Haverford College which has to be seen to be believed.
Additionally , 'ye olde' cricket clubs have heaps of memorabilia
pertaining to cricket . One that particularly stuck in my mind was a
depiction of a game between the Gentlemen of Philadelphia and a
visiting side from England. In this picture, specatators are
lined up, dozens deep around the entire perimeter of the
ground and across the street on a
hill where apartment blocks have since been built. The year was 1890
and cricket had reached its zenith in North America, particularly Philadephia. There were
probably 5000 people in attendance at this game. IMAGINE that.
While cricket at this level
petered out by about 1913, cricket has lived on, in one form or another
ever since. What was palpable to me and others on tour this year, is
that cricket in the USA appears to be undergoing a renaissance
of sorts. Two things stood our out for me as being particularly
impressive at this tournament. For one, there were Americans
participating and some of them were quite good. One in particular, made
50 batting for one of the local teams. The second outstanding event we
witnessed was the local juniors putting on an exhibition of Kanga
Cricket and other games besides on the day of the finals, just prior to
the final itself. We were told that there are over 400 juniors actively
playing cricket in the area today and the number is growing. Junior
development is a high priority with the local clubs and the local
participation is obvious.
I commend Stephen Willott's
efforts to promote junior development in our neck of the woods and I
look to all of you to help support this effort. I have suggested before
and will say again, that it is absolutely in the interest of our league
and cricket , in general, to ensure that we
have both local participation and
junior development. Cricket in the Carolinas and Virginia prospers only because we are able to
field a league or leagues with ex-patriots from cricket playing
nations. On a couple of occasions, the ANZACs have included Americans in
their line up but only to fill the roster. How many other teams can
make the same claim? Why, for example, doesn't NCSU have more "local"
participation. The exclusivity of this league and cricket, in general ,
is to the continuing detriment of the sport in this country.
The league, in my never to be
humble opinion, lacks a vision for the future. While we have made great
strides developing Shiloh into a facility of which we can all be
proud, it is not where our future lies, if threre is indeed to be a
future. Visualize, if you will, an oval of appropriate side with a
clubhouse of some description that we call the home of cricket here in
the Carolinas. Imagine kids of various ages
participating in cricket leagues at this ground in games played in the
mornings on days when the league plays cricket in the afternoon.
Picture local teams made up of ex-patriots and local players, perhaps
with incentives for teams to include local players. I'll leave the rest
to your imagination.
If you are as interested in the
promotion of cricket in the USA as I am, I encourage you to give this
serious thought. There is no future for the MACC, at least, if we don't
start paying attention to this now. You can read it in the history
books, if you don't believe me.
On a final note, the ANZACs are a
social club, first and foremost.. We also play cricket. Our passion is
for touring. Our schedule, in the league, is greatly influenced by
this.. I'm sure I speak for every single member of the Philadelphia touring side when I say we were all
deeply moved by the entire experience. Everyone who went this year and
will be available next year is champing at the bit to do it again. If
the rest of you blokes, particularly the ones who have never been on
tour, went with us, I'm confident you'd feel the same. As far as next
year's tournament is concerned, I'd like to find ourselves in a
situation where we have to select a side to tour. I would like to see
twenty "wanderers" travel to Philadelphia next year. The tournament schedule is
gruelling and twenty is barely enough to ensure we put our top side on
the field for each game. I'm supremely confident we can win the whole
damn shooting match, accordingly.
In the interim, the ANZACs fully
expect to be invited for the seventh time to the Sarasota International
Sixes Cricket Tournament in Florida over Thanksgiving. This is a
tremendously well organized tournament yet more social (if that's
possible) than the Philadelphia tournament. While we don't usually have trouble
fielding a side for the tournament, we rarely have options. I implore
those ANZACs who have not yet toured and also others in the MACC to
express an interest in attending this year. This is a tournament we
have come close to winning in the past and can well win in the future, no
matter what international first class players come along to play on
other sides. Our meagre effort last year alone almost upset Mike
Gatting's side, if you can imagine, and we have made the finals in
year's past;. The format involves four matches with the best two teams in each division
proceeding to the semi-finals. If we could assemble a quality squad of
ten players, I'm confident we can win the tournament with ease. There
is more than enough talent in the MACC, at large, to ensure this.
If I've inspired any of you to
consider contributing both to ANZACs and MACC success, going forward,
please let me, Stephen Willottt or Jonathan Botha know. If we get
enough interest in this year's tournament in Sarasota, we may be able to prevail upon the
tournament organizers to allow
us to enter a second team in the social competition. In any case, I
will personally assure that anyone who comes to Sarasota with us will have a great time, even
if they play only one or two games. We already have guys signed up who
would be happy to come and not play at all. How about that for an endorsement?
I hope this missive has reached a
largely receptive audience. If anyone would like to discuss anything
with me personally, please email me. While I wish the MACC every
success in the future, I humbly and sincerely hope that at least some
of the allusions I've made herein will, at least, promote new debate.
Home